Open Theism
Or, "Flirting with heresy"
Well, here it is. This is my confession to the world. I've gone and done it. I've sided with one of the most controversial and hotly debated views about God that Christians have.
I've become an Open View Theist.
Most people who read that probably went, "Huh? What's Open View Theism?" Others, who knew what it was beforehand, probably frowned. So what is Open Theism?
1) There is no truth about future contingents (A contingent truth is something that is true but didn't have to be). Only the present exists.
2) We have complete free will.
3) God knows everything that is true.
4) Since there is no truth about future contingents, God essentially doesn't know the future, or what choices we will make. He does know all possible counterfactuals*, but not what choice we will make.
*Counterfactual - I'll explain this in simple terms. There are hundreds of possible counterfactuals for any given situation. If you saw a peanut butter jar sitting on a table, you could a) pick it up, b) knock it down, c) eat it without picking it up, etc. Those are all counterfactuals.
"That doesn't sound Biblical. Is this supported by the Bible?"
Sure. There are many examples:
- "The Lord frequently changes his mind in the light of changing circumstances or in the light of prayer (Exod. 32:14; Num. 14:12-20; Deut. 9:13-14, 18-20, 25; 1 Sam. 2:27-36; 2 Kings 20:1-7; 1 Chron. 21:15; Jer. 26:19; Ezek. 20:5-22; Amos 7:1-6; Jon. 1:2; 3:2, 4-10). Other times he explicitly tells us he will change his mind if circumstances change (Jer. 18:7-11; 26:2-3; Ezek. 33:13-15). This willingness to change is portrayed as one of God's attributes of greatness (Joel 2:13-14; Jon. 4:2).
- A number of times he expresses regret and disappointment over how things have turned out - even over previous decisions he has made which went array because of human free will (Gen. 6:5-6; 1 Sam 15:10,35; Ezek. 22:29-31).
- Other times he tells us he's surprised at how things turned out, for he expected a different outcome (Isa. 5:3-7; Jer. 3:6-7; 19-20).
- In several passages the Lord explicitly tells us that he did not know that humans would behave the way they did (Jer. 7:3 1; 19:5; 3 2:3 5).
- The Lord frequently tests his people to find out whether or not they'll remain faithful to him (Gen. 22:12; Exod. 16:4; Deut. 8:2; 13:1-3; Judg. 2:20-3:5; 2 Chron. 3 2:3 1).
- The Lord sometimes asks non-rhetorical questions about the future (Num. 14:11; Hos. 8:5) and speaks to people in terms of what may or may not happen (Exod. 3:18-4:9; 13:17; Jer. 3 8:17-18, 20-21, 23; Ezek. 12:1-3)." (Boyd)
"But wait, hold up! You're diminishing God's power by saying that!"
I don't see that I am. I fully contend that God is omniscient, knowing all that can be known. I don't believe the future can be known. In the same way that I think God is all powerful but can't create a rock so big that he cannot lift it, I believe that God is omniscient but can't know what choices free beings will make. I think that knowing the future actions of a free being is logically impossible.
"The Bible says that God knows all things!"
You're right. It does.
"But what about prophesy? How can that be possible if God doesn't know the future?"
I'd say that, to some extent, God predicts/plans the future when it suits him to do so. In these situations, it does. You'd surely that God is much, much wiser than we are? Surely he's wise enough to acheive his purposes while still allowing full freedom.
"What about prayer?"
What about it? It makes the concept make a LOT more sense. If God knew what you were going to pray to begin with, there's no point in praying; of course, I'd argue that you wouldn't have a choice to pray or not if God knew the future.
"So how did you come to this descision?"It took a very, very long time. The Free Will Argument for the Non-Existence of God struck me when I first heard it (probably...hmm, ten months ago now) and caused very serious doubts in me about it. This is it:
- God knows the future.
- God's knowledge is perfect and can't be wrong.
- God knows that P-Dunn will be typing these words at 3:49 PM on Saturday, September 2nd.
- Since God's knowledge cannot be wrong, P-Dunn MUST type those words at the given time. There is no choice.
- God is not omniscient, or he doesn't exist.
But what about the Free Will Argument? How is it possible that we still have free will, yet God knows our every action? It seems contradictory.
Open Theism makes this problem evaporate immediately. Since I've decided to become an Open Theist, I'm no longer trying to figure this problem out, because Premise 1 is immediately false. In addition, most of the atheistic arguments like The Problem of Evil become much less effective.
I'm going to be checking out God of the Possible by open theist Gregory Boyd, a scholar interviewed by Lee Strobel in The Case for Christ. Maybe you should too.
======================
Boyd, Gregory. "God and the Future." Open Theism Information. <http://www.opentheism.info/pages/information/boyd/god_future.php>
======================
© Copyright P-Dunn's Apologetics. All rights reserved.


3 Comments:
Oh boy. You've done it now. But wait a second.......time for me to drop a bombshell......I have actually changed my semi-Calvinist position since our beating sessions at the beach. I'm now (and the world gasps in horror) entertaining the notion of Open Theism. Yes, I know. I'm a flip-flopper. But I've come to this semi-conclusion in the last couple of weeks. What has converted me to this heretical mindstyle? God changing His mind. I can't deny that God has changed His mind, most often in the Old Testament. God openly changing His mind (and deeming it necesarry to record it)is pretty heavy stuff. Now, I beleive in a totaly consistent God. I beleive that His nature never changes, nor does His ultimate plan. The way I see it, God is like a chess master. He knows every possible reaction to every possible action, and how to let Himself be reflected in that. God does, essentially know the future. He can't be suprised. In fact, you could go and say that God authored the concept of action and reaction, and surprise, and therefore is above all of them. What are your thoughts on that semi-logical explanation of a semi-problem, Patrick? More specifically, do you beleive God is subject to the laws and concepts He created (logic, truth, morality, knowledge, etc.)?
Oops, forgot to say this. I would say be careful to examine your motives for adopting this position. Is it JUST to render atheist arguments void? Or is it to further understand our Lord? Not that I'm implying you AREN'T adopting this view for that purpose, but wanted to stimulate some thought.
*ignored*
Post a Comment
<< Home